Computers, they don’t make them like they use too!
Every once in a while, I am asked “which computer should I buy?” My response used to be go with a Dell, IBM or Compaq. Today, I now usually recommend, get a good warranty. I may still be new to computers compared to some of my colleagues, but in the past 12 years I have been working extensively with them, I have noticed a decline in their quality. I really think that manufactures are now cutting costs by putting out cheaper equipment and betting on customers not purchasing extended warranties.
In the more than 8 years I have worked at the COB, I have noticed our newer servers have a much higher failure rate than our older servers. This is not just exclusive to the COB. Other RIT departments have reported an increase in hardware failures with their newer equipment. Are manufactures cutting costs to the point where they are putting inferior components into their computers?
This makes me wonder if the manufactures are trying to make computers a throw away commodity. We purchase a computer that lasts about two to three years rather than one lasting five to six years. This means we are purchasing computers more often. Are the manufactures making more money with this methodology despite the fact that computer prices have fallen in recent years? Is this hurting the computer industry by creating less reliable systems that are used for everything from writing a paper to running a corporation? What do you think?